Debunking Evolution
I’m here to dispute evolution. Yes, that’s right! Not only do I dispute the very ideals and beliefs about god, but I also reveal secrets about evolution. Here we go!
If you believe in evolution, this may just change your mind… Or if you’re ignorant enough to believe what anyone will tell you if enough people with college degrees lie about it and ‘make it law’. Truth is, evolution – the theory – is NOT a fact. It is, however, a ‘scientific fact’. How is this so? A scientific fact only requires a bit of research (be it 100% conclusive or not) and a theory to back it up! (See: wikipedia.com/Fact)
So those who say that putting faith into an intangible, “magical” god without having “facts” or “proof” to back it up, are obviously also confused about their own beliefs in evolution. Now, some may say, “Well, thanks to carbon dating, we can establish periods in time in which certain lifeforms and rock belong, thus proving evolution.” This just isn’t true. Let’s explain carbon dating. What many accounts fail to mention, is that radiocarbon dating (aka carbon dating, c14 dating, etc.) is only accurate up to 60,000 years prior. Whether or not even this is a true timespan, is left to you to determine. But this is commonly accepted as accurate information. (Source: http://www.c14dating.com/k12.html)If it is only accurate up to 60,000 years, there is absolutely NO way to prove millions of years of evolution with this method.
Now, on to plants. When did plants get here? Where did they come from? Truth is, no one knows. Google it, or what-have-you, and you will find nothing about how single cell organisms (the basis of evolution) became multi-cell organisms (plants, animals, etc.). They say that it happened sometime about 200 million years ago. Note, again, the lack of proof that it happened and when it happened.
Going back to the idea that all life is derived from a single cell organism… The theory is that we all evolved from a single bacteria. Well, let’s look at bacteria, shall we? There are about 2000 different types of bacteria. Bacteria have a lifespan of anywhere between twenty minutes to a couple weeks. Within this period, they reproduce more bacteria. Bacteria that are exactly the same as their parent. Every time. (Source: http://www.ehow.com/i/#article_4614584) So, the theory that some magical bacteria one day decided to go rogue and become multi-cellular is simply a blatant lie. Again, try to look up exactly how this magical single cell bacteria morphed into a multi-cell organism some 200 million years ago.
ow about dinosaurs? Well, just recently, dinosaur remains that were ‘dated’ at 68 million years, were found with soft tissue still in tact. Soft tissue has been accepted to only be able to preserve for about 100,000 years in good conditions. (Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050325100541.htm) Now, this team of scientists is insisting that tissue can live longer, rather than accepting that dinosaurs and the world is not millions of years old and actually lived during the same period as man, as that would throw the entire evolution theory out of sync.
If you believe in creationism and that dinosaurs were here during the same period that man was, you know that even 100,000 years is just too old. In the book of Genesis, we can read that God created man and animals at the same time. He also commanded all animals and man to feed upon the fruits of the land, making them non-meat-eaters. It’s also widely accepted fact that the earliest dinosaurs were herbavors. Just like all animals were originally. When Adam and Eve betrayed God, were cast out of the Garden of Eden, and had their children, the world was no longer peaceful. Cane committed the first murder. Animals began eating other animals. Also, in the account of Noah and his arc, Noah is commanded to take up pairs of all the domestic animals and not the beasts of the land. Hmm, what could this be? Dinosaurs, maybe? These scriptures are easily found via Google searches, thus my lack of citation.
And what about Darwin? The guy who started all this hooplah! Plenty can be said about this naturlist, but the most hard-hitting of all truths about Darwin, is that near the end of his career and life, he often would state that he thought the origin of man was of a creationist descent, and not that of evolution.
Whatever you believe; it’s all a bit much either way. I have to believe in creationism, simply because it’s ridiulous to think that a single cell organism can change on a whim in its short lifetime, without free will or a higher power guiding it. Especially when it is a proven fact that a bacteria is still a bacteria after reproduction. Every time. And why are primates still around? Did they simply decide they didn’t want to evolve? There are too many holes in science. Does this make me a church-going bible thumper? Not at all. This makes me educated and simply choose to find my own way through self-guided research.
Evolution. No major truth. No facts that strongly prove this theory. Magical single cell organism that somehow morphed into a multi-cell organism. Modern day prophets?
Creationism. No facts that strongly prove this theory. Magical heavenly bodies, miracles, etc. Ancient scientists with skills in writing?
Believe the words of ‘educated’ men or ‘enlightened’ men?
